One of the biggest proofs of God for me is what C.S. Lewis, a convert, called the “Moral Law.” It is only seen in humans. Although sometimes animals show some tiny speck of morality, they are not common, nor consistent. But is this state I shall call conscience intrinsically human or just a result of cultural ubringing?
Many people today buy into a philosophy called post-modernism. Here, there are no ultimate truths, and all right and wrong is subjective. But then how can post-modernism itself be true, as there are not ultimate truths?
Now for more about Moral Law. One of the greatest forces for this Modern Law is altruism: our conscience urging us to help others even if we do not receive any benefits, or even if it causes us harm. Note: altruism is not give and take, it is simply give. C.S. Lewis coined this selfless love agape. This goes against pretty much everything evolutionists say ought to happen naturally. They say that people’s motives are driven by a desire to perpetuate their gene pool. But how did Mother Theresa’s helping the lepers of Calcutta help her gene pool? Some say that this is a positive attribute in mate selection. But nonhuman primates do the exact opposite. Instead of helping others raise their young, for example, most chimps will practice infanticide so that his genes are more dominant. Others say that these acts will help us in the future, but this does not account for the favors somebody does for random people he will never meet again. Still others say that altruism will help the whole group, but almost all evolutionists agree that mutations arise in individuals which then become successful, or weeded out in turn within the population thorugh natural selection.
So if Naural Law or Moral Law is not cultural or biological, then how did it come about. Again, we return to our friend C.S. Lewis “If there was a ctonrolling power outside of the universe, it could not show itself to us as one of the facts in the universe, just as an architect cannot be a wall of the house he designed. He (or she) could only show himself inside ourselves as an influenc trying to get us to behave in a certain way, just as we find.”
So how can such beliefs be held by a scientist? What about data? Well, fortunately, this is only part one.